Can a court extend an arbitrator’s mandate after an award?
C. Velusamy v. K. Indhera on post-expiry relief under Section 29A.
An independent initiative advancing accessible, efficient and institutional dispute resolution through research, engagement and community.
Explore landmark and recent decisions on arbitration, with concise case analyses and links to the primary judgments.
C. Velusamy v. K. Indhera on post-expiry relief under Section 29A.
My Preferred Transformation v. Faridabad Implements on holiday deadlines under Section 34.
Arif Azim Co. v. Aptech separates a late appointment petition from a potentially time-barred claim.
Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium reshaped the relationship between arbitral seat and court supervision.
Vidya Drolia v. Durga Trading on referral review and the tribunal’s primary role.
Cox and Kings v. SAP India revisits consent and the group of companies doctrine.
Guest research, case notes and editorial work on arbitration and investment treaty practice. Browse the archive for the full collection.
Equal participation in arbitrator appointments: the CORE Constitution Bench ruling
Stamp duty and arbitration agreements: the seven-judge decision in In Re
Emergency arbitration in India: enforcing the emergency arbitrator’s order
India’s treaty recalibration, investor protection and the global reform debate around ISDS.
Consent, scope and form: three questions that shape the first steps of an arbitration.
How the procedural framework is chosen, and what parties should consider when drafting.
A closer look at the UNCITRAL Expedited Arbitration Rules and party choice.
Start with a focused guide, then follow its sources into the law and procedure that govern your dispute.
Consider consent, covered disputes, seat, governing rules and a practical route to appoint the tribunal.
Compare administration, appointment steps, procedural rules and the responsibilities the parties retain.
Review party agreement, timetable, evidence needs and the safeguards required for a fair opportunity to be heard.
Spot one-sided appointment rights, restricted panels and the need for equal participation.
Explore proposed discussions and add verified records of completed activities. Confirm all dates and details before announcing or publishing.
Event dates selected; confirm start times, format and speaker details before promotion.
Proposed discussion · Seat, rules and appointment procedures in commercial contracts.
Proposed case discussion · Court referral and the tribunal’s role.
Proposed roundtable · Practical barriers and possible improvements in ADR.
Archive suggestions received · dates below have passed, but occurrence and public recaps have not yet been verified.
8 August 2026 · Online discussion
Public recap or supporting link: not supplied
22 August 2026 · Practical webinar
Public recap or supporting link: not supplied
12 September 2026 · Research presentation and Q&A
Public recap or supporting link: not supplied
26 September 2026 · Case discussion
Public recap or supporting link: not supplied
Send confirmation that an activity took place and include a public recap or supporting link. Only verified completed activities will be counted as past events.
Send verification details ↗LexResolution welcomes original research on institutional arbitration and access to justice in India, including analysis of law, procedure, institutional practice and reform.
LexResolution invites original, unpublished research on how institutional arbitration can become more accessible, effective and responsive to the needs of commercial users in India. Submissions may examine law, institutional practice, procedure or reform.
Read submission guidelines ↗Please submit original, unpublished work. Sending a manuscript does not guarantee publication; the editorial team will contact authors about next steps.
LexResolution was founded to create a professional knowledge-sharing platform focused on ADR, institutional arbitration and commercial dispute resolution.
We seek to connect students, young practitioners and professionals with practical knowledge, research and discussions on contemporary developments in dispute resolution. Our work is shaped by curiosity, accessibility and a commitment to thoughtful legal engagement.
We share our community reach with its counting basis and will update it as the figure is verified.
250+ is the reported community reach. Counting basis: unique young practitioners, each counted once; add a measurement date when the total is next verified.
LexResolution aims to bring together students, early-career professionals and experienced practitioners around practical questions in ADR and arbitration.
Join the conversation by suggesting a research topic, asking about a proposed discussion, or sharing original work. Use the email link to contact the team.
Help make dispute resolution knowledge more accessible through considered writing and open professional exchange.
Email LexResolution ↗For research contributions, engagement and general enquiries, reach out to LexResolution.